Does this mean the creature still does damage during the attack? I'm envisioning a creature dealing damage and then leaving the fight because it "doubts the violence". This card captures the feeling of the Gaians very well, I think.
Also, minor point of grammar: the word "it's" does not need an apostrophe. When "it" is used possessively, it is spelled "its"; "it's" means "it is". Kind of a strange quirk with the English language. (Sorry about being picky with the grammar; the finished cards need to be perfect.)
[playtest] Doubt the Violence
Re: Doubt the Violence
Shortened text somewhat and also added something to meet Q_x correct worries about it killing of very expensive creatures cheaply. + Made it cost 1 more.
Yes, last line suggests it actually does do some damage before it is sent back home.
Yes, last line suggests it actually does do some damage before it is sent back home.
Re: Doubt the Violence
This might change the potency of the card, but what if it were to cost X and could send a creature of X or less to the pile? That way, if you place it on a large RP you can remove a larger creature...snowdrop wrote:Shortened text somewhat and also added something to meet Q_x correct worries about it killing of very expensive creatures cheaply. + Made it cost 1 more.
- irrevenant
- Posts:44
- Joined:Sun Nov 28, 2010 00:13
Re: Doubt the Violence
An alternate card title that would go very well with the picture IMO is "Remorse" ?