Search found 101 matches
- Mon Nov 26, 2012 05:59
- Forum: Presentation
- Topic: Hello there
- Replies: 3
- Views: 19922
Re: Hello there
Welcome, cnelsonsic! ViCE development is slow moving (read glacial), but feel free to contribute in whatever way you see fit. Project Page: http://github.com/aspidites/ViCE Issue Tracker: http://github.com/aspidites/ViCE/issues Documentation: aspidites.github.com/ViCE The documentation is your best ...
- Tue Sep 18, 2012 18:15
- Forum: Presentation
- Topic: Hello
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10127
Re: Hello
Gaspard... wolf avatar. parpg?
- Thu Aug 16, 2012 17:56
- Forum: General
- Topic: My Public "Crazy Experiment" Dropbox
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9433
Re: My Public "Crazy Experiment" Dropbox
Given all your rants about micromanagement, i KNOW that card's a joke, lol. Anyways, the link to the LDD was wrong:
http://wtactics.org/wiki/index.php?titl ... _%28ORC%29
http://wtactics.org/wiki/index.php?titl ... _%28ORC%29
- Sun Aug 12, 2012 18:42
- Forum: General
- Topic: Not Really Lore, But...
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8567
Re: Not Really Lore, But...
I hate nested quotes so forgive me if this is too ambiguous, Mattaiyah. @POV: Given a lack of precedence for POV's in WTactics, how can you really say with this is supposed to be? Funny you mention the soapbox, I imagined a guy giving his last words before execution, or rambling at a bar table with ...
- Sun Aug 12, 2012 17:04
- Forum: General
- Topic: My Public "Crazy Experiment" Dropbox
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9433
Re: My Public "Crazy Experiment" Dropbox
Couple of things in general, but nothing card specific: * The more I see them, the less fond I am of drop-caps. They look decent enough when cards are worded carefully, but seem to detract from any other formatting (eg highlighted keywords) that might be found in the card text. I think there was som...
- Sun Aug 12, 2012 16:43
- Forum: General
- Topic: Not Really Lore, But...
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8567
Re: Not Really Lore, But...
I had a really long post and lost it some how. I'm too lazy to recall what was written, so I'll just leave it to this: @Mudskipper: Thanks. I agree with snowdrop about not perceiving one's self as evil. Also remember that this is unfinished work (and highly unpolished, inconsistent, and displays flo...
- Sat Aug 11, 2012 14:38
- Forum: General
- Topic: Not Really Lore, But...
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8567
Not Really Lore, But...
Sent to snowdrop, got no reply. Here for public for consumption, public ridicule, and to preserve the record: I wrote this a second ago for kicks, with two goals: Try to see what it might feel like to be inside the head of a member of the Shadow Guild Gain an appreciation for why its so difficult to...
- Wed Aug 01, 2012 00:22
- Forum: Rules
- Topic: Card wording: Card referencing itself?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7395
Re: Card wording: Card referencing itself?
I'd say that the last type present should be used. Rationale: * I can't say first for the reason you already showed * I could say first non-adjective type, but aside from being cumbersome to say, it forces players to have to scan from left to right until such an occurrence is found. While consistent...
- Mon Jul 30, 2012 05:20
- Forum: Rules
- Topic: Card wording: Card referencing itself?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7395
Re: Card wording: Card referencing itself?
@Ravenchild: yours is rather similar to mine (or rather, it addresses the issue from the same point of view), but cleaner. I like it. Honestly, if a card's name is only stated once in the affect text, I don't see much of a problem. An expansion of the "this card" idea might be to make card types pro...
- Sun Jul 29, 2012 18:42
- Forum: Rules
- Topic: Card wording: Card referencing itself?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7395
Re: Card wording: Card referencing itself?
As long as you can reveal a Ghost card in you hand or the top card of your
discard pile is a creature, Spectre Madji cannot be dealt combat damage.
I'm not saying that this wording is perfect, but I think it's concise and minimizes the repetition of the card name.
discard pile is a creature, Spectre Madji cannot be dealt combat damage.
I'm not saying that this wording is perfect, but I think it's concise and minimizes the repetition of the card name.