Nature's Outrage
Since there are tree cities I think the card would need clarification as to only include flower and tree creatures.
Re: Nature's Outrage
Hi,
Well since a city has no attack value, it can't attack anyway. Don't think it is unclear.
If it comes up again we might change the text to be more clear.
There is for now only one Tree City, and that's the ancient tree. It was a test case if cities should have subtypes as well.
Thx for the feedback,
Nico
Well since a city has no attack value, it can't attack anyway. Don't think it is unclear.
If it comes up again we might change the text to be more clear.
There is for now only one Tree City, and that's the ancient tree. It was a test case if cities should have subtypes as well.
Thx for the feedback,
Nico
Re: Nature's Outrage
I just noticed something else about Nature's Outrage. Currently it reads
But the rules about conflicting rules sayAll trees and flowers can attack this turn.
So I believe it should be changed to "All trees and flowers with peaceful can attack this turn as though they didn't have peaceful." (which I think is the intention of the card) Because otherwise the card wouldn't do anything.If an effect forbids something, while another effect allows it, that something is forbidden. "No, not, can't" etc. always outweigh "can".
Re: Nature's Outrage
Hey Clemens,
You are of course completely right. The card wouldn't do anything. When designing a card there is often distinction between the intent and the phrasing. In Dutch we call it 'the spirit of the law' vs 'the letter of the law'.
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll change it accordingly.
Kind regards,
Nico
You are of course completely right. The card wouldn't do anything. When designing a card there is often distinction between the intent and the phrasing. In Dutch we call it 'the spirit of the law' vs 'the letter of the law'.
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll change it accordingly.
Kind regards,
Nico
Re: Nature's Outrage
Hey Nico,
I understand the intention, I just want to point that stuff out so the cards get more and more towards their finished version, especially if they will get printed soon.
While we're at it, another card I found problematic (this time as in I actually didn't fully understand the intent) was Nourished Flower. It triggers every time the player casts a gaian spell, but the rules don't yet define what a spell ist. Is it like in MtG and it triggers at every gaian card? Or only at Magic cards? Or Magic and Event cards? Not clear to me.
I understand the intention, I just want to point that stuff out so the cards get more and more towards their finished version, especially if they will get printed soon.
While we're at it, another card I found problematic (this time as in I actually didn't fully understand the intent) was Nourished Flower. It triggers every time the player casts a gaian spell, but the rules don't yet define what a spell ist. Is it like in MtG and it triggers at every gaian card? Or only at Magic cards? Or Magic and Event cards? Not clear to me.
Re: Nature's Outrage
Think it means the last one of those.... in contrast to MtG we don't call every card "a spell"...Clemens wrote:Is it like in MtG and it triggers at every gaian card? Or only at Magic cards?
Re: Nature's Outrage
Hi Clemens, snowdrop,
I did intent it to be triggered on every every gaian card played by it's controller.
I changed the text to 'card' instead of 'spell'. If it would only trigger on events, we can just say so 'every time you play a Gaian Event'. Same would be true for all other types.
I wanted it to be for every gaian card.
Thx, for sorting this out.
Nico
I did intent it to be triggered on every every gaian card played by it's controller.
I changed the text to 'card' instead of 'spell'. If it would only trigger on events, we can just say so 'every time you play a Gaian Event'. Same would be true for all other types.
I wanted it to be for every gaian card.
Thx, for sorting this out.
Nico
Re: Nature's Outrage
Hi Clemens,
Kind regards,
Nico
You're totally right, I have changed it as such.Clemens wrote:All trees and flowers with peaceful can attack this turn as though they didn't have peaceful." (which I think is the intention of the card) Because otherwise the card wouldn't do anything.
Kind regards,
Nico